Austerity measures leave Special groups alone

Throughout Europe - with the exception of Iceland - the people are being forced to pay for the 'mistakes' of the Bankers.  Iceland has proven that the only way to deal with the Banking criminals is to let their businesses fail, and to arrest them for crimes against the people.  Sadly, in the rest of Europe, the grip of the Bankers is so complete that the people are being made to pay with their own money, to make up the profits lost by the greedy Banking cartels.  If any other businesses lose such vast amounts of money that they cannot operate, they close - and so should the Banks.  Indeed, the entire immoral system of usury should be closed, regardless of whether it is in debt or profit.

The Bankers' puppet governments have introduced Austerity measures across Europe, which include interest rate freezes, tax hikes, and cuts in services.  Free Banking in the UK has all but ended, so now we have a situation where it is nigh on impossible to pay for one's utilities, or to receive pay from an employer, without having a bank account, but not only does it cost money to have one; the greedy profiteers no longer pay a level of interest which covers the costs of having an account!  That is theft, pure and simple.

In the UK, the Bankers' chum, Chancellor Osborne, has become the focal point of the people's anger; deflecting anger from the hidden rulers who are the real source of policy, regardless of the espoused politics of the government of the day.  The present government has made much of the idea of closing tax loopholes, and of preventing people who are not entitled to Welfare Benefits from receiving them.  As has become the norm in the UK, the spotlight of scrutiny has not fallen evenly across all those resident in the UK.

People in the UK are taxed more than any other nation in Europe, and for that matter most of the world.  We have to pay tax on every penny we earn, and every penny we spend.  The State even has the audacity to take a cut of any money we may have saved for our children, with its outrageous Inheritance Tax and Death Duties.  

As well as taxation at national level, we have local taxation.  Every household in the country has to pay 'Council Tax', which amounts to around £1000 per annum per dwelling in the least affluent areas, increasing with the value of the property.  Council tax is allegedly to pay for services provided by the local administrative authorities, but considering that almost every service has been contracted out to profit-making companies, the reality of Council tax is that it is yet another way to rob the people, and transfer what little money we have into the hands of the private companies which rule over us.  It is illegal to not pay Tax, thus the system is tantamount to an extortion racket - either we pay those who exploit us, or we are punished by their legal system, in terms of fines (more extorted money), or imprisonment.

There is an exception to the Council Tax rule.  Those who claim to live in accommodation which is used as a place of worship, do not have to pay the tax.  What this means in effect, is that all one has to do to escape the attention of the tax mafiosa (and dodge the tax system) is to register as a religious leader. The tax exemption is not something which benefits the indigenous population, as can be seen by the fact that Churches are closing in the UK at an accelerating rate; many re-opening as Madrassas and (non-indigenous) Community Centres.  

The people who benefit from the tax loophole which the Establishment refuses to close, are the newcomers to our shores.  In Bradford, there are literally thousands of private homes which are registered as Mosques, thus allowing the immigrant population to keep hold of the money it generates, whilst the indigenous population is economically impoverished.  Much of the spending of the local authority is dedicated to services for the immigrant population, including their own schools, community centres, health centres etc, all funded by the host population, which does not use them.  The official Mosques have largely been funded through taxation; disproportionately raised by by extorting funds from the indigenous population.  The term Dhimmitude has been much over-used in recent years, but in this area it is appropriate.

The local council dedicates much of the money it raises into programmes to combat 'racism' (by which they mean feelings of resentment amongst the host population to becoming second class citizens in our own land; not the real supremacist hatred expressed by the newcomers, which apparently doesn't matter).  There are many programmes for the benefit of the newcomers, but not a single one for the indigenous people.  It is understandable that the newcomers will take advantage of everything which they are given, and they should not be blamed for that.  It is the politically correct enemies of the nation who devise policy who deserve our ire.

It is not only Muslims who are heavily subsidised by the taxation system.  Hindus, Sikhs, Jews and indeed every other religious group which is favoured by the State, all benefit from the tax loophole.  The only people who do not, are - yes - the people to whom the country belongs.  Why should religion be a reason for tax exemption?  If we lived in a theocracy, and there was one religion enshrined by the State, then there would be no reason for places of worship to be given preferential treatment, as they would be an integral part of society.  We do not live in a theocracy. 

If people wish to worship in an organised manner, let them pay for the costs of the places they use; it is beyond arrogant for people of any faith to expect their beliefs to be paid for by others.  Without tax exemption for religious places, those which flourish would provide income to the local authorities, and those which did not, would die.  Any religion which cannot survive without grandiose displays of material wealth, deserves to fail.  The reason for policies which effectively subsidise all manner of religious thought, is to facilitate the proliferation of many competing cultures, at the expense of the indigenous one which must suffer thereby.  Multi-culturalism gives the non-indigenous cultures everything on a plate, and the indigenous culture has to pay for it.

Council Tax is not the only area in which the ordinary people are penalised for the benefit of special 'chosen' groups.  Education centres are tax exempt.  The ludicrous situation exists where the state education system keeps children in  ignorance of anything which matters, and where the only real education which can be obtained is in the fee-paying sector, and the specialist schools for members of ethnic groups from outside the country.  The self-appointed elite have enough money to pay for their children to be educated away from the plebeian masses, but then the schools to which they send their children, have charitable status, and so contribute nothing to the economy. 

If all so-called public (private) schools had to pay into the tax system, that would greatly enrich the coffers of the exchequer.  The existence of a two-tier education system in which the common people receive nothing but indoctrination and knowledge sufficient only for servitude, in institutions which the elite wouldn't consider sending their children to, is offensive to the nation as a whole.  If the State sector is not good enough for the Elite, then it is not good enough for anyone.  There should be no such thing as fee paying schools, faith schools, or other charitable schools, and in a sane world, all of them would be nationalised, or at the very least, permanently closed down. 

So what can we do?  We can home school and thus keep the state away from our children.  Those who can afford to send their children to the elite schools, should refuse to as a matter of principle.  There is no excuse for the class system, and anything which props it up is repugnant.  

We could campaign for the tax exemption on religious grounds to be ended, thus making the newcomers pay their way - but of course that would meet deaf ears, or possibly police attention.  More realistically, we can register our homes as places of worship, and stop paying our enemies for our own demise.  I wonder if the local authorities will so readily accept our claims to piety?  If they refuse to accept our expressions of belief as valid, then surely that amounts to prejudice and, ahem, to 'discrimination' on racial and religious grounds?  Of course that is what we experience on a daily basis, but wouldn't it be interesting to use their own multi-culti nonsense against them?  It is certainly worth a try, both financially and morally.  

As a tip, it is possible to buy religious titles from (unsurprisingly), the USA, at an initial cost which is a fraction of the annual saving - although check the legality before buying!  If the mumbo jumbo of the many diverse religions now infesting our shores is given legal protection from much needed ridicule, then any faith should have legal respect, and therefore if we state that we are religious, it should be a 'human right' according to the liberal lunacy, that what we proclaim is taken seriously.  The temptation is to ridicule the system by finding the most outlandish faith to espouse, but sticking with an established indigenous one, may be a better idea!  At the very least, we should be finding ways to stop funding those who seek to destroy us.  This isn't tax evasion, but common sense.  Why pay a penny to our enemies, if we can legally avoid it?